Dr. Steffen Murau| steffenmurau.com

‘Rethinking Monetary Sovereignty. The Global Credit Money System and the State’ (with Jens van ‘t Klooster)

This article proposes a conception of monetary sovereignty that recognizes the reality of today’s global credit money system. Monetary sovereignty is typically used in a ‘Westphalian’ sense that simply denotes the ability of states to issue and regulate their own currency. This article rejects the Westphalian conception. Instead, it proposes a conception of effective monetary sovereignty that focuses on what states are actually able to do in the era of financial globalization. It fits the hybridity of the modern credit money system by acknowledging the crucial role not only of central bank money but also of money issued by regulated banks and unregulated shadow banks. These institutions often operate ‘offshore’, outside a state’s legal jurisdiction. Monetary sovereignty consists in the ability of states to effectively govern these different segments of the monetary system and thereby achieve their economic policy objectives.

Presentation at the International Studies Association’s annual convention, Toronto (03/2019)

Co-author:
Jens van ‘t Klooster, European University Institute

Related articles

‘Towards a Macro-financial Model of the Eurozone Architecture’

While it has become a widespread understanding that the architecture of the Eurozone is ill-constructed and deficient, it is not always clear what exactly is meant by this term. To develop an answer to the […]

Learn More

‘The Evolution of the Offshore US-Dollar System: Past, Present and Four Possible Futures’ (with Joe Rini and Armin Haas)

Little has contributed more to the emergence of today’s world of financial globalization than the design of the international monetary system. In its current setup, it has a hierarchical structure with the US-Dollar at the […]

Learn More

‘States, Markets – and Technocrats. Revisiting the Origins of Financial Globalization’ (with Benjamin Braun and Arie Krampf)

International political economy (IPE) has explained financial globalization as the result not merely of market pressure but of states deciding to open up and liberalize their financial systems. Challenging this ‘negative integration’ view as incomplete, […]

Learn More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *