2019 | ‘States, Markets – and Technocrats. Financial Globalization Reconsidered’ (with Benjamin Braun and Arie Krampf) – Dr. Steffen Murau
Dr. Steffen Murau| steffenmurau.com

2019 | ‘States, Markets – and Technocrats. Financial Globalization Reconsidered’ (with Benjamin Braun and Arie Krampf)

International political economy (IPE) has explained financial globalization as the result not of structural forces such as technological progress or world trade but as the result of active promotion by states. By refuting the view that states merely gave in to market pressures, IPE made an important step but failed to go all the way – it has not challenged the conventional understanding of liberalization as states removing barriers to capital flows and market forces. We argue that financial globalization after the end of the Bretton Woods regime was the result not of the liberalization of markets but of infrastructural entanglement between private actors and a narrow and identifiable group of technocratic actors – primarily national central bank experts, the IMF, and the BIS. We conceptualize these transnational technocrats as intermediaries between the public and the private spheres whose activities cut right through the state-market dichotomy that has bedeviled IPE. Drawing on archival material and on new historical research, we trace the emergence of infrastructural entanglement in the context of the rise and transformation of the Eurodollar market during the 1970s.

Presentations at the Politics of Money conference, Brighton (05/2018), the SASE conference, Kyoto (06/2018), the International Studies Association’s annual convention, Toronto (03/2019), the ECPR Joint Workshop Sessions, Mons (04/2019)

Co-authors:
Benjamin Braun, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne
Arie Krampf, Academic College of Tel Aviv Yaffo and Ben Gurion University

Related articles

2019 | ‘Private Credit Money Accommodation. Rethinking Monetary Sovereignty (with Jens van ‘t Klooster)

The conventional way of thinking about the monetary system implies that we live in a world of ´fiat money’. The state – typically represented by the central bank—is conceived as the primary authority that creates […]

Learn More

2016 | ‘EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy‐Making. Bridging the EU Studies – New Regionalism Divide’ (with Kilian Spandler), Journal of Common Market Studies

This article compares the European Union’s (EU) actorness in foreign financial policy to that of the US and ASEAN. It thus contributes to the dialogue between EU studies and the New Regionalism by putting it […]

Learn More

2018 | ‘The Future of Offshore Dollar Creation. Four Scenarios for the International Monetary System by 2040’ (with Joe Rini and Armin Haas)

In order to sketch the possibility space for the future setup of the International Monetary System (IMS), this paper develops four different scenarios that outline potential outcomes of the IMS’s evolution by 2040. These scenarios […]

Learn More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *