Dr. Steffen Murau| steffenmurau.com

‘All Quiet on the Fiscal Front? Off-Balance-Sheet Fiscal Agencies in the German War Economy, 1914–1918’ (with Armin Haas, Andrei Guter-Sandu, and Olan McEvoy)

It is an established narrative in the literature that the German Empire financed World War I through an extensive issuance of sovereign debt with support of the central bank, the Reichsbank. Indeed, the sovereign debt burden of the Reich and the states combined increased from around 5 billion marks in 1914 to approximately 156 billion marks in 1918 at the end of the war. Despite these staggering numbers, an understanding of war finance that merely focuses on the balance sheets of the treasury and the central bank cannot provide an accurate picture of how an initial expansion and funding of war-related debts was carried out in the German monetary architecture as it misses out on the paramount role that off-balance-sheet fiscal agencies played at the time. In this paper, we trace the activities of six types of OBFAs along three stages of the war finance operations: from the outbreak of the war in summer 1914 to spring 1915; from spring 1915 to spring 1916; and from spring 1916 to the end of the war in November 1918. First, the Darlehnskassen (Loan Societies) were sub-balance sheets of the Reichsbank that supported expansion of the war economy by issuing Darlehnskassenscheine as a parallel currency and acted as market-maker for sovereign debt. Second, the Seehandlung was Prussia’s state-bank that stimulated expansion and helped with funding throughout the war. Third, Kriegskreditbanken were financial institutions that played an important role in the expansion phase of the first two months of war. Fourth, Kriegsgesellschaften (War Societies)were private sector institutions that became increasingly entangled with the state during the war and operated at an accelerated pace in the third stage as the war economy increasingly faced shortages. A similar dynamic was exhibited, fifth, by state-owned enterprises. Finally, industrial associations played an important role in the governance of the German war economy. To carve out the role of OBFAs in the war finance activities, we reconstruct the monetary architecture of the German war economy and translate the activities of the treasury, the Reichsbank, and key OBFAs into flow charts that analytically distinguish between initial expansion and long-term funding.

Co-authors:
Armin Haas, Global Climate Forum
Andrei Guter-Sandu, University of Bath
Olan McEvoy, Global Climate Forum

Related articles

2022 | ‘Für eine Ausstattung des Energie- und Klimafonds mit Kreditermächtigungen’ (with Jan-Erik Thie), Wirtschaftsdienst

Energiesicherheit und -unabhängigkeit sind der neue Imperativ nach dem von Wladimir Putin befohlenen Angriffskrieg auf die Ukraine. Eine beschleunigte Transformation hin zur Klimaneutralität dient damit gleichzeitig ökologischen und sicherheitspolitischen Zielen. Sie erfordert massive öffentliche Investitionen […]

Learn More

‘Transformation of the Eurozone Architecture. On Crises and Institutional Change in the Offshore US-Dollar System’ (with Alexandru-Stefan Goghie, Matteo Giordano and Friederike Reimer)

The Eurocrisis was a make-it-or-break-it moment for the EMU with a profound impact on the transformation of the Eurozone architecture. However, its underlying macro-financial causes remain insufficiently understood. While dominant narratives emphasize excessive sovereign debt […]

Learn More

‘A Feature, Not a Bug. The US Dollar in the European Monetary Union’ (with Torsten Ehlers)

The European Monetary Union (EMU) is often seen as an attempt to shield Europe from USD dominance. However, as BIS data shows, the USD’s volume and share in EMU cross-border payments has been constantly rising […]

Learn More